Iran War and its Consequences for Europe: A Shock and a Vision

Iran War and its Consequences for Europe: A Shock and a Vision

It is obviously too early to evaluate seriously the effects of the present Iran war on Europe. It will definitely have different effects, and it is to be feared that these will be predominantly negative – at least in the short run. The question is if a new alliance between the Gulf countries – possibly including Türkiye – and the European Union can grow out of the ashes of this war. One only can hope that this dreadful war will also offer new chances.

Parallel to the diversification, Europe raised its production of energy out of sustainable resources. Nevertheless, the war in Iran and especially the Iranian blockade of the street of Hormuz is an enormous threat for a continuous energy supply, as demand for energy is expected to grow with the duration of the war.

Trump – From Peace President to War President

Trump – From Peace President to War President

Trump began his second term with the promise that he would end wars rather than start new ones. He had already envisioned winning the Nobel Peace Prize for himself. However, things have changed dramatically. After the relatively ‘soft’ – though still illegal, military intervention in Venezuela he subsequently launched, together with Israel, a full-scale attack on Iran. As Robert Malley and Stephen Wertheim wrote (The New York Times - International Edition - March 7/8): “President Trump’s attack on Iran is astonishing in its audacity, aggression and lawlessness (...) The self-appointed president of peace has turned into an embolden warmaker.” The renaming of the Department of Defense as ‘Department of War’ already signaled the new direction of U.S. foreign policy under Donald Trump. And War Secretary Pete Hegseth further underlined this shift in mindset: “The dumb, politically correct wars of the past were the opposite of what we are doing here”. 

US-Objectives in Iran: Surrender or Early Exit?

US-Objectives in Iran: Surrender or Early Exit?

President Trump has demanded the “unconditional surrender” of Iran. At the same time, he has claimed that the war would be over within four—and later six—weeks. Republican Senator Tommy Tuberville added that the “conflict should be very short and sweet”. The President later even referred to the war in Iran as a “short-term excursion”. A complete regime change through an air campaign alone appears unlikely, given Iran’s deeply entrenched political structures. A genuine revolution that does not leave at least parts of the old system intact would require far more than a simple reorganization of the administrative apparatus or the replacement of one group of rulers by another faction from the old elite.

Freiheit im Iran

Freiheit im Iran

Seit dem 28. Dezember 2025 gehen im Iran wieder Menschen zu Tausenden auf die Straße. Diesmal nicht als Reaktion auf einen einzelnen Todesfall wie 2022. Diesmal aus einer akkumulierten Erschöpfung heraus: wirtschaftlicher Kollaps, politische Hoffnungslosigkeit, und das Wissen, dass das Regime seit dem zwölftägigen Krieg mit Israel im Sommer 2025 regional geschwächt ist wie nie zuvor.

Das Regime reagiert auf diese äußere Schwäche mit verstärkter innerer Gewalt – ein Muster, das wir historisch immer wieder beobachten können: Wer nach außen verliert, kompensiert nach innen.

IRAN: BEVÖLKERUNG BLEIBT IM WIDERSTAND

IRAN: BEVÖLKERUNG BLEIBT IM WIDERSTAND

Die USA und Israel haben mit „Epic Fury“ neuerlich eine das Völkerrecht klar verletzende Militärintervention gestartet. Führende Köpfe wurden getötet, und nun hoffen Trump und Netanyahu, dass die Bevölkerung aufsteht und das Regime auf den „Misthaufen der Geschichte“ wirft. Aber inwieweit können solche Interventionen von außen zu einer siegreichen Revolution im Inneren beitragen? Jedenfalls, die illegale Aktion von Israel und den USA ändert nichts daran, dass das Regime unter der Führung des jetzt getöteten Geistlichen Oberhaupts Chamenei ein furchtbares und für viele Menschen tödliches Regime war.

EUROPE SHOWS A STRONGER DEFENSE COHESION. IT MUST NOW ADVANCE ITS ARMS CONTROL INTERESTS

EUROPE SHOWS A STRONGER DEFENSE COHESION. IT MUST NOW ADVANCE ITS ARMS CONTROL INTERESTS

The erosion of the rules-based global order has been a constant topic of discussion in the last few years. One of the most serious illustrations of that trend is the end of half a century of bilateral arms control agreements between the United States and the Soviet Union, then Russia, with the expiry earlier this month of New START—the last in the long line of negotiated bilateral agreements to bring down nuclear arsenals.

CHINA - EUROPE’S NEW FAVORITE PARTNER?

CHINA - EUROPE’S NEW FAVORITE PARTNER?

Europe’s neighbor Russia and its ally the United States, both are - in different ways - challenging a Europe which wants peace on its continent built on a strong transatlantic alliance. Russia is still our neighbor and Europe - economically and militarily - is closely connected with the U.S. Nevertheless, Europe has to look for new partners around the globe. The challenges posed by Russia and the Unites Stares are too long-term and decisive to neglect.